Affichage des articles dont le libellé est Results. Afficher tous les articles
Affichage des articles dont le libellé est Results. Afficher tous les articles

vendredi 21 août 2015

Some battery test results



Today did some basic tests to see how the batter compared to a Sony Z Ultra.

Be advised this is not a fair test, the ZU is 2 years old. While the device has been properly maintained and not stressed a lot, its still with a two year old battery.

Screen on ( ZU: 45%, X2: 50% ( brighter then ZU to compensate the battery somewhat )), no activity.

ZU: Lost about 11% in 75 minutes.
X2: Lost about 4% in 75 minutes.

At that rate the devices will last:

ZU: 11h15 minutes
X2: 31h10 minutes

Now this matches up with a review i read where they state that the X2 will last 35 hours with screen on.

The double to triple battery life seems to match up with the reviews i read before. Its powering a bigger screen, higher resolution, has more memory ( 3GB vs 2GB ), and still triple the ( 2 year old ) ZU, despite given a extra handicap with a high screen usage.

Some benches:

AnTuTu:

ZU: 39.900
X2: 49.200

About 25% better benchmark performance. Memory had clearly more bandwidth, faster internal flash, CPU score was a bit of a head breaker. Faster on multithread and float ( probably because of the 64 bit ) but slower in the single core ( pure ) integer performance.

Screens:

If both devices are put next to each other, the ZU its color looks more washed ( grayish ) out compared to the X2. The X2's color are more stronger.

So far its a great ZU replacement.

Things i do not like: The screen has a higher output for everything ( everything looks bigger on the screen ) compared to the ZU where they reduced the rendering size for the font/etc, giving more content on the screen.

This needs a fix somehow ( do not know if this can be changed with a setting or needs a custom rom ).

That is it. Not a lot of time right now.



mercredi 12 août 2015

App results in blank black screen on android phone....why?



I have removed all the elements from my layout and commented out references to the controls etc that I did have in my layout:


Code:


<FrameLayout xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android"
    xmlns:tools="http://schemas.android.com/tools"
    android:layout_width="fill_parent"
    android:layout_height="fill_parent"
    android:background="#0099cc"
    tools:context=".HexapodControls"
    android:id="@+id/frame_controls"
    android:visibility="visible"
    android:paddingTop="50dp">

    <!-- The primary full-screen view. This can be replaced with whatever view
        is needed to present your content, e.g. VideoView, SurfaceView,
        TextureView, etc. -->

    <!-- This FrameLayout insets its children based on system windows using
        android:fitsSystemWindows. -->

</FrameLayout>


So why, when I generate the apk in android studio and install it on my phone, do I get a blank black screen.

I give up! What have I changed to cause this?



mardi 11 août 2015

Flashing any rom results in infinite boot



I have tried the roms below:
Pac-rom
LiquidSmooth
CyanogenMod 12.1
CyanogenMod 11

And the result is it always gets stuck at boot where the boot animation continues infinitely. I have gave it about 30 minutes to boot.

With LiquidSmooth I was able to run logcat, but CM12.1 I am not able to.

I have tried resetting system, data, caches in twrp and using the reset for new rom in philz.
I have tried flashing with both TWRP and Philz.
I am using the latest Philz and TWRP.

The only thing that has worked for me is samsung stock ROM, but I do not like the stock ROM.

Are there SPH-L900 phones you have to do something different?
Is there a way to get boot logs from CM12?
Am I doing something wrong?

See attachment from LiquidSmooth.














Attached Files






File Type: txt LquidSmooth.txt -
[Click for QR Code]
(5.8 KB)